<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (8) TMI 66 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383877</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT CHENNAI allowed the Miscellaneous Applications for condonation of delay, filed by the appellants due to a genuine reason involving an 85-year-old appellant&#039;s inability to coordinate with counsel. The Tribunal found the delay of forty-six days not excessive and listed the appeals for hearing, considering the circumstances.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Aug 2019 06:24:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=582038" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (8) TMI 66 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383877</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT CHENNAI allowed the Miscellaneous Applications for condonation of delay, filed by the appellants due to a genuine reason involving an 85-year-old appellant&#039;s inability to coordinate with counsel. The Tribunal found the delay of forty-six days not excessive and listed the appeals for hearing, considering the circumstances.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383877</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>