https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282308 A rejected mining-lease applicant could invoke revision under Rule 54 of the Mineral Concession Rules, 1960 because an aggrieved person may challenge the State Government's order, provided the successful applicant is impleaded. A State Government recommendation in favour of an applicant did not amount to a concluded grant of lease: prior Central Government approval and the remaining statutory lease formalities had not been completed. Because no registered lease deed or completed grant existed, the area could still be reserved by the Central Government under Section 17-A(1-A) of the MMDR Act for government operations, and the reservation notification and revisional order were upheld. en-us Wed, 26 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 23 Aug 2019 11:01:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282308 A rejected mining-lease applicant could invoke revision under Rule 54 of the Mineral Concession Rules, 1960 because an aggrieved person may challenge the State Government's order, provided the successful applicant is impleaded. A State Government recommendation in favour of an applicant did not amount to a concluded grant of lease: prior Central Government approval and the remaining statutory lease formalities had not been completed. Because no registered lease deed or completed grant existed, the area could still be reserved by the Central Government under Section 17-A(1-A) of the MMDR Act for government operations, and the reservation notification and revisional order were upheld. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 26 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282308