<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1946 (8) TMI 24 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282302</link>
    <description>For section 24(2), a carried-forward loss can be set off only against profits from the same business. Whether two trading activities form one business is a question of fact, tested by inter-connection, inter-lacing, inter-dependence and unity. On the record, no evidence supported treating silver speculation and cotton speculation as separate businesses, so the finding of separateness could not stand. The speculative activities were held to constitute one business, and the silver speculation loss was therefore allowable against the cotton speculation profits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Aug 1946 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Aug 2019 14:41:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=581988" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1946 (8) TMI 24 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282302</link>
      <description>For section 24(2), a carried-forward loss can be set off only against profits from the same business. Whether two trading activities form one business is a question of fact, tested by inter-connection, inter-lacing, inter-dependence and unity. On the record, no evidence supported treating silver speculation and cotton speculation as separate businesses, so the finding of separateness could not stand. The speculative activities were held to constitute one business, and the silver speculation loss was therefore allowable against the cotton speculation profits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Aug 1946 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282302</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>