https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383868 A writ challenge to a condition requiring deposit of 20% of the disputed tax for stay of recovery pending appeal was rejected. The Court noted that the reassessment had resulted in an ex parte assessment after no documents or reply were produced, and held that the petitioner's contention that no consideration was received on transfer of tenancy was an issue for the statutory appeal, not a ground to relax the deposit condition in writ jurisdiction. The challenge to the recovery condition was therefore dismissed. en-us Mon, 15 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 01 Aug 2019 06:27:47 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383868 A writ challenge to a condition requiring deposit of 20% of the disputed tax for stay of recovery pending appeal was rejected. The Court noted that the reassessment had resulted in an ex parte assessment after no documents or reply were produced, and held that the petitioner's contention that no consideration was received on transfer of tenancy was an issue for the statutory appeal, not a ground to relax the deposit condition in writ jurisdiction. The challenge to the recovery condition was therefore dismissed. Case-Laws Income Tax Mon, 15 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383868