<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (8) TMI 45 - ITAT SURAT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383856</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the addition of Rs. 2,42,91,150/- as long-term capital gain, dismissing the assessee&#039;s claim that the land was beyond municipal limits. However, the Tribunal allowed the deduction under Section 54B, recognizing the agricultural use of the land as indicated in the revenue records. The appeal was partly allowed, with the decision pronounced on 26.07.2019.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 31 Jul 2019 12:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=581935" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (8) TMI 45 - ITAT SURAT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383856</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the addition of Rs. 2,42,91,150/- as long-term capital gain, dismissing the assessee&#039;s claim that the land was beyond municipal limits. However, the Tribunal allowed the deduction under Section 54B, recognizing the agricultural use of the land as indicated in the revenue records. The appeal was partly allowed, with the decision pronounced on 26.07.2019.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383856</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>