<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Court Rules Property Not Deemed Dividend u/s 2(22)(e); Belongs to Company, Not Shareholder-Director.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=48322</link>
    <description>Deemed dividend u/s 2(22)(e) - purchase of property in the name of shareholder-director - the Board Resolution coupled with the entries in the books of account and Balance Sheets as at 31.3.2012 and 31.03.2013 constitute the clinching evidence to show that the said property really belongs to the Company and the assessee merely held the same for and on behalf of the Company - cannot be treated as deemed dividend</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Aug 2019 06:26:43 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Aug 2019 10:31:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=581933" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Court Rules Property Not Deemed Dividend u/s 2(22)(e); Belongs to Company, Not Shareholder-Director.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=48322</link>
      <description>Deemed dividend u/s 2(22)(e) - purchase of property in the name of shareholder-director - the Board Resolution coupled with the entries in the books of account and Balance Sheets as at 31.3.2012 and 31.03.2013 constitute the clinching evidence to show that the said property really belongs to the Company and the assessee merely held the same for and on behalf of the Company - cannot be treated as deemed dividend</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Aug 2019 06:26:43 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=48322</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>