<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (8) TMI 17 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383828</link>
    <description>The court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, emphasizing the importance of official records and the burden of proof on the Revenue in establishing the nature of the land. The judgment highlighted the significance of documentary evidence and statutory records in determining the agricultural classification of the land, ultimately leading to the dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Aug 2019 06:06:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=581894" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (8) TMI 17 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383828</link>
      <description>The court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, emphasizing the importance of official records and the burden of proof on the Revenue in establishing the nature of the land. The judgment highlighted the significance of documentary evidence and statutory records in determining the agricultural classification of the land, ultimately leading to the dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383828</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>