<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (8) TMI 16 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383827</link>
    <description>A reopening under Section 147 must rest on recorded reasons showing an independent, rationally connected basis for a live belief that income escaped assessment. The Bombay HC noted that reliance mainly on the Shah Commission report and broad export-price comparisons, without material showing undisclosed income or a suppression device, was too speculative to justify reopening. It also stated that any alleged illegality in the mining activity did not change the character of the receipts into income from other sources, nor could new grounds be added later to sustain the notices. The impugned reopening notices were therefore quashed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Jan 2025 17:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=581892" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (8) TMI 16 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383827</link>
      <description>A reopening under Section 147 must rest on recorded reasons showing an independent, rationally connected basis for a live belief that income escaped assessment. The Bombay HC noted that reliance mainly on the Shah Commission report and broad export-price comparisons, without material showing undisclosed income or a suppression device, was too speculative to justify reopening. It also stated that any alleged illegality in the mining activity did not change the character of the receipts into income from other sources, nor could new grounds be added later to sustain the notices. The impugned reopening notices were therefore quashed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383827</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>