<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (7) TMI 1533 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282283</link>
    <description>The ITAT allowed the appeal, directing the deletion of the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) for the assessment year 2007-08. The ITAT held that the penalty was unjustified as the facts did not conclusively establish concealed income, emphasizing the consistent application of the percentage completion method by the assessee in previous years without penalty imposition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Aug 2019 05:52:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=581873" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (7) TMI 1533 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282283</link>
      <description>The ITAT allowed the appeal, directing the deletion of the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) for the assessment year 2007-08. The ITAT held that the penalty was unjustified as the facts did not conclusively establish concealed income, emphasizing the consistent application of the percentage completion method by the assessee in previous years without penalty imposition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282283</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>