<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (1) TMI 1680 - PATNA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282292</link>
    <description>The Patna High Court rejected the State of Bihar&#039;s appeal due to a delay of 367 days in filing. The court found the explanation for the delay unsatisfactory, emphasizing the need for timely action and diligence in legal proceedings, particularly for state entities. The court refused to condone bureaucratic delays, underscoring the importance of defending rights promptly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Aug 2019 05:52:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=581869" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (1) TMI 1680 - PATNA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282292</link>
      <description>The Patna High Court rejected the State of Bihar&#039;s appeal due to a delay of 367 days in filing. The court found the explanation for the delay unsatisfactory, emphasizing the need for timely action and diligence in legal proceedings, particularly for state entities. The court refused to condone bureaucratic delays, underscoring the importance of defending rights promptly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282292</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>