https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282291 Renewal commission under the proviso to Section 44(1) of the Insurance Act is subject to an embargo against soliciting or procuring insurance business for another person. High Court treated the embargo in clause (c) as applying across all eligibility categories, including clauses (a), (b), (bb) and (bbb), based on the proviso's language, structure and purpose. A former agent who breaches that condition cannot preserve entitlement by relying on an alternative eligibility clause. The Article 14 challenge failed because the restriction was considered reasonable and the interpretation avoided discriminatory treatment. The renewal-commission claims were rejected. en-us Thu, 28 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 01 Aug 2019 05:52:29 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282291 Renewal commission under the proviso to Section 44(1) of the Insurance Act is subject to an embargo against soliciting or procuring insurance business for another person. High Court treated the embargo in clause (c) as applying across all eligibility categories, including clauses (a), (b), (bb) and (bbb), based on the proviso's language, structure and purpose. A former agent who breaches that condition cannot preserve entitlement by relying on an alternative eligibility clause. The Article 14 challenge failed because the restriction was considered reasonable and the interpretation avoided discriminatory treatment. The renewal-commission claims were rejected. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 28 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282291