https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19186 The court found that questions 1 and 5 were factual and aligned with established law, not necessitating a reference. Question 3 on commission payment was also factual and did not raise legal issues. However, question 2 on weighted deduction under section 35B was deemed to involve a legal query, requiring referral. Similarly, question 4 on the classification of building expenditure raised a legal issue, warranting referral. Consequently, the court directed the Tribunal to refer questions 2 and 4 for opinion, with no costs awarded. en-us Fri, 10 Mar 1995 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 04 Nov 2009 14:25:33 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19186 The court found that questions 1 and 5 were factual and aligned with established law, not necessitating a reference. Question 3 on commission payment was also factual and did not raise legal issues. However, question 2 on weighted deduction under section 35B was deemed to involve a legal query, requiring referral. Similarly, question 4 on the classification of building expenditure raised a legal issue, warranting referral. Consequently, the court directed the Tribunal to refer questions 2 and 4 for opinion, with no costs awarded. Case-Laws Income Tax Fri, 10 Mar 1995 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19186