<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (6) TMI 874 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282279</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision that provisions for leave encashment, staff incentive, and gratuity, determined through actuarial valuation, constitute ascertained liabilities and should not be added back to book profits u/s 115 JB of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal remanded the issue of staff incentive provision back to the Assessing Officer for further examination. The revenue&#039;s appeals were partly allowed for statistical purposes based on these decisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 31 Jul 2019 17:36:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=581848" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (6) TMI 874 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282279</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision that provisions for leave encashment, staff incentive, and gratuity, determined through actuarial valuation, constitute ascertained liabilities and should not be added back to book profits u/s 115 JB of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal remanded the issue of staff incentive provision back to the Assessing Officer for further examination. The revenue&#039;s appeals were partly allowed for statistical purposes based on these decisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282279</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>