https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282276 A mere notification under Sections 4 and 6 of the Land Acquisition Act does not extinguish the owner's title; title passes only when possession is taken under Sections 16 or 17. Until possession is actually taken, the land may still be considered under the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, and Section 2(q)(i) was not read as excluding land solely because acquisition proceedings had begun. The article also notes that Section 42 gives the ceiling law overriding effect where there is no real inconsistency with the acquisition law, and the contrary view of the District Judge was held erroneous, with the ceiling proceedings restored. en-us Tue, 07 Aug 1984 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 31 Jul 2019 12:05:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282276 A mere notification under Sections 4 and 6 of the Land Acquisition Act does not extinguish the owner's title; title passes only when possession is taken under Sections 16 or 17. Until possession is actually taken, the land may still be considered under the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, and Section 2(q)(i) was not read as excluding land solely because acquisition proceedings had begun. The article also notes that Section 42 gives the ceiling law overriding effect where there is no real inconsistency with the acquisition law, and the contrary view of the District Judge was held erroneous, with the ceiling proceedings restored. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 07 Aug 1984 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282276