<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (7) TMI 1486 - ITAT INDORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383790</link>
    <description>The Tribunal quashed the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax&#039;s order invoking section 263, holding that the omission of section 92BA(i) meant that the Assessing Officer&#039;s failure to refer the specified domestic transactions to the Transfer Pricing Officer was not erroneous or prejudicial to the revenue. The appeal filed by the assessee was allowed, and the order impugned by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2022 18:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=581787" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (7) TMI 1486 - ITAT INDORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383790</link>
      <description>The Tribunal quashed the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax&#039;s order invoking section 263, holding that the omission of section 92BA(i) meant that the Assessing Officer&#039;s failure to refer the specified domestic transactions to the Transfer Pricing Officer was not erroneous or prejudicial to the revenue. The appeal filed by the assessee was allowed, and the order impugned by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383790</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>