<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (11) TMI 29 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19179</link>
    <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that the payment made to the partners was dividend income arising from the chit transaction, not commission. The Court affirmed the Tribunal&#039;s decision, stating that section 40(b) of the Income-tax Act did not apply in this case. Consequently, the Court answered the question in the affirmative, against the Department, with no costs awarded and the decision favoring the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 14:11:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=58178" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (11) TMI 29 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19179</link>
      <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that the payment made to the partners was dividend income arising from the chit transaction, not commission. The Court affirmed the Tribunal&#039;s decision, stating that section 40(b) of the Income-tax Act did not apply in this case. Consequently, the Court answered the question in the affirmative, against the Department, with no costs awarded and the decision favoring the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19179</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>