<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (7) TMI 1473 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383777</link>
    <description>The court directed the respondent to provide a certified copy of the order to the petitioner within a specified timeframe, ensuring it is sent to the correct address. The court clarified that the date of receipt of the certified copy would be crucial for any future computations related to the impugned order. Ultimately, the writ petition was disposed of with this directive, and no costs were awarded in the matter.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 31 Jul 2019 04:32:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=581765" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (7) TMI 1473 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383777</link>
      <description>The court directed the respondent to provide a certified copy of the order to the petitioner within a specified timeframe, ensuring it is sent to the correct address. The court clarified that the date of receipt of the certified copy would be crucial for any future computations related to the impugned order. Ultimately, the writ petition was disposed of with this directive, and no costs were awarded in the matter.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383777</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>