https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383773 Section 8 referral to arbitration was unavailable because the later compromise superseded the earlier agreement and did not preserve any arbitration clause. The dispute in the money suit arose from post-compromise conduct, including alleged failure to appoint the claimant as stockist and claimed loss of goodwill, so it was outside the scope of the earlier arbitration clause. Allegations that the compromise decree was vitiated by fraud also required evidence and civil adjudication. The arbitral reference was therefore set aside and the money suit restored for trial in accordance with law. en-us Tue, 30 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 30 Jul 2019 18:15:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383773 Section 8 referral to arbitration was unavailable because the later compromise superseded the earlier agreement and did not preserve any arbitration clause. The dispute in the money suit arose from post-compromise conduct, including alleged failure to appoint the claimant as stockist and claimed loss of goodwill, so it was outside the scope of the earlier arbitration clause. Allegations that the compromise decree was vitiated by fraud also required evidence and civil adjudication. The arbitral reference was therefore set aside and the money suit restored for trial in accordance with law. Case-Laws Companies Law Tue, 30 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383773