https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383771 The appeal was dismissed by the Tribunal, upholding the Registrar of Companies' decision to strike off the Appellant Company's name due to non-compliance with statutory requirements. The Tribunal found that the Appellant Company was not in operation, engaged in activities inconsistent with its stated business, and failed to demonstrate just grounds for restoration under Section 252(3) of the Companies Act, 2013. Additionally, the Tribunal rejected the objection regarding the maintainability of the appeal by a disqualified Director, stating it was legally infirm and unwarranted. en-us Tue, 09 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 12 Nov 2021 18:12:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383771 The appeal was dismissed by the Tribunal, upholding the Registrar of Companies' decision to strike off the Appellant Company's name due to non-compliance with statutory requirements. The Tribunal found that the Appellant Company was not in operation, engaged in activities inconsistent with its stated business, and failed to demonstrate just grounds for restoration under Section 252(3) of the Companies Act, 2013. Additionally, the Tribunal rejected the objection regarding the maintainability of the appeal by a disqualified Director, stating it was legally infirm and unwarranted. Case-Laws Companies Law Tue, 09 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383771