https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383762 Where the first appellate authority failed to record clear findings on the authenticity of transactions and the bona fides of the selling dealer, remand was justified because the matter had not been finally determined on material issues. However, once the Tribunal set aside that order, it could not control the fresh adjudication by directing the assessing authority how to conduct the enquiry. The remand was therefore upheld, but the directions prescribing the manner of enquiry were held unsustainable, and the revision succeeded only to that limited extent. en-us Wed, 17 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 14 Oct 2019 11:06:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383762 Where the first appellate authority failed to record clear findings on the authenticity of transactions and the bona fides of the selling dealer, remand was justified because the matter had not been finally determined on material issues. However, once the Tribunal set aside that order, it could not control the fresh adjudication by directing the assessing authority how to conduct the enquiry. The remand was therefore upheld, but the directions prescribing the manner of enquiry were held unsustainable, and the revision succeeded only to that limited extent. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Wed, 17 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383762