<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Contested Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) Overruled Due to Lack of Evidence and Invalid Confession in Tax Case.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=48298</link>
    <description>Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - return filed disclosing higher income u/s 153A - no incriminating material found - when the Revenue could not lay hands on any tangible material except conditional and tacit averments, which confession in itself is seen to be non-admission of any ingenuity - no hesitation to hold that such confession u/s 139(4) cannot be the basis for imposition of onerous penalty</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jul 2019 04:31:30 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Jul 2019 14:05:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=581745" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Contested Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) Overruled Due to Lack of Evidence and Invalid Confession in Tax Case.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=48298</link>
      <description>Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - return filed disclosing higher income u/s 153A - no incriminating material found - when the Revenue could not lay hands on any tangible material except conditional and tacit averments, which confession in itself is seen to be non-admission of any ingenuity - no hesitation to hold that such confession u/s 139(4) cannot be the basis for imposition of onerous penalty</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jul 2019 04:31:30 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=48298</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>