<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (2) TMI 1671 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282270</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the imposition of penalty under Section 271(1)(c) was not sustainable due to the lack of incriminating material, the acceptance of income declared under Section 153A without modifications, the absence of inaccurate particulars of income, and the vague nature of the AO&#039;s notice. The Tribunal directed the AO to delete the penalty imposed and allowed similar appeals involving identical issues, directing the deletion of respective penalties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 31 Jul 2019 04:31:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=581743" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (2) TMI 1671 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282270</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the imposition of penalty under Section 271(1)(c) was not sustainable due to the lack of incriminating material, the acceptance of income declared under Section 153A without modifications, the absence of inaccurate particulars of income, and the vague nature of the AO&#039;s notice. The Tribunal directed the AO to delete the penalty imposed and allowed similar appeals involving identical issues, directing the deletion of respective penalties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282270</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>