<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (12) TMI 30 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19171</link>
    <description>The High Court held that the gains from the sale of bonus equity shares should be included in the assessee&#039;s income as capital gains for income tax purposes. The court emphasized that the cost of bonus shares cannot be considered nil and must be valued by spreading the cost of old shares over the old and bonus shares, citing relevant legal precedents. The decision was in favor of the Revenue, with no order as to costs in the case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 13:53:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=58170" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (12) TMI 30 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19171</link>
      <description>The High Court held that the gains from the sale of bonus equity shares should be included in the assessee&#039;s income as capital gains for income tax purposes. The court emphasized that the cost of bonus shares cannot be considered nil and must be valued by spreading the cost of old shares over the old and bonus shares, citing relevant legal precedents. The decision was in favor of the Revenue, with no order as to costs in the case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19171</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>