<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (7) TMI 1440 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383744</link>
    <description>The High Court determined that the expenditure for renovation and upgrading of a stadium by the Cricket Club of India was revenue in nature, not capital expenditure. The Court agreed with the Tribunal that the expenditure was for improving existing facilities, not creating new assets or enduring benefits. Consequently, the Court dismissed the Income Tax appeal, affirming the Tribunal&#039;s decision that the expenditure was revenue in nature.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Jul 2019 07:47:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=581685" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (7) TMI 1440 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383744</link>
      <description>The High Court determined that the expenditure for renovation and upgrading of a stadium by the Cricket Club of India was revenue in nature, not capital expenditure. The Court agreed with the Tribunal that the expenditure was for improving existing facilities, not creating new assets or enduring benefits. Consequently, the Court dismissed the Income Tax appeal, affirming the Tribunal&#039;s decision that the expenditure was revenue in nature.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383744</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>