<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (7) TMI 1435 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383739</link>
    <description>The ITAT allowed the appeal, directing the Assessing Officer to delete the addition under section 40(a)(ia) of the Income-tax Act for A.Y 2013-14. Citing a Supreme Court judgment, the ITAT applied the amendment to section 40(a)(ia) retrospectively from A.Y 2005-2006, emphasizing equitable treatment and avoiding unintended consequences for the assessee. The decision underscores the importance of interpreting tax laws to uphold their purpose and protect taxpayers&#039; interests.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Jul 2019 07:27:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=581676" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (7) TMI 1435 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383739</link>
      <description>The ITAT allowed the appeal, directing the Assessing Officer to delete the addition under section 40(a)(ia) of the Income-tax Act for A.Y 2013-14. Citing a Supreme Court judgment, the ITAT applied the amendment to section 40(a)(ia) retrospectively from A.Y 2005-2006, emphasizing equitable treatment and avoiding unintended consequences for the assessee. The decision underscores the importance of interpreting tax laws to uphold their purpose and protect taxpayers&#039; interests.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383739</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>