https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383734 The commentary states that show-cause notices and the adjudication order were issued by officers validly invested with customs and excise powers under the governing notifications and statutory scheme, so the jurisdictional challenge failed. It also explains that writ interference was declined because the impugned order was appealable, writ jurisdiction is ordinarily not exercised against a mere show-cause notice or where an effective statutory remedy exists, and no special circumstance justified bypassing that remedy. The petitioner had been heard, and the matter was relegated to the statutory appellate process. en-us Thu, 11 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 30 Jul 2019 06:49:22 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383734 The commentary states that show-cause notices and the adjudication order were issued by officers validly invested with customs and excise powers under the governing notifications and statutory scheme, so the jurisdictional challenge failed. It also explains that writ interference was declined because the impugned order was appealable, writ jurisdiction is ordinarily not exercised against a mere show-cause notice or where an effective statutory remedy exists, and no special circumstance justified bypassing that remedy. The petitioner had been heard, and the matter was relegated to the statutory appellate process. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 11 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383734