<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (7) TMI 1425 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383729</link>
    <description>The Appellant-workmen challenged the Adjudicating Authority&#039;s order denying relief for unpaid salaries during the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process. The Tribunal declined to intervene but allowed all employees to file claims with the Liquidator for review. The Liquidator would assess the claims, and individuals could appeal rejected claims to the Adjudicating Authority. It was clarified that Gratuity and Provident Funds were not assets of the Corporate Debtor but were to be distributed to entitled employees. The judgment stressed the importance of due process in resolving salary disputes and employee benefit disbursement.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 31 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Jul 2019 06:41:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=581663" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (7) TMI 1425 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383729</link>
      <description>The Appellant-workmen challenged the Adjudicating Authority&#039;s order denying relief for unpaid salaries during the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process. The Tribunal declined to intervene but allowed all employees to file claims with the Liquidator for review. The Liquidator would assess the claims, and individuals could appeal rejected claims to the Adjudicating Authority. It was clarified that Gratuity and Provident Funds were not assets of the Corporate Debtor but were to be distributed to entitled employees. The judgment stressed the importance of due process in resolving salary disputes and employee benefit disbursement.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383729</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>