https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383711 The Tribunal set aside the impugned order, ruling in favor of the appellant, an SSI unit, who had initially availed and then reversed CENVAT credit, subsequently paying the duty in cash. The Tribunal found the appellant entitled to recredit the amount, as the duty was paid twice. The Tribunal deemed the original authority's confirmation of demand, interest, and penalty unsustainable in law, allowing the appellant's appeal and rejecting the Commissioner (Appeals)' decision. en-us Mon, 15 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 11 Nov 2024 16:57:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383711 The Tribunal set aside the impugned order, ruling in favor of the appellant, an SSI unit, who had initially availed and then reversed CENVAT credit, subsequently paying the duty in cash. The Tribunal found the appellant entitled to recredit the amount, as the duty was paid twice. The Tribunal deemed the original authority's confirmation of demand, interest, and penalty unsustainable in law, allowing the appellant's appeal and rejecting the Commissioner (Appeals)' decision. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 15 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383711