<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (7) TMI 1397 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383701</link>
    <description>The court upheld the existence of a deviation proposal impacting the assessment process and directed the impugned assessment orders to be treated as revisional notices for Denovo assessment. Writ petitioners were instructed to pay 15% of disputed tax within a specified timeframe, followed by a personal hearing to consider objections in light of the deviation proposal. The court emphasized comprehensive review of objections and mandated the respondent to redo the revised assessment expeditiously, incorporating findings from the hearing and the deviation proposal within twelve weeks. The judgment aimed to ensure procedural integrity under the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Jul 2019 06:20:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=581624" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (7) TMI 1397 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383701</link>
      <description>The court upheld the existence of a deviation proposal impacting the assessment process and directed the impugned assessment orders to be treated as revisional notices for Denovo assessment. Writ petitioners were instructed to pay 15% of disputed tax within a specified timeframe, followed by a personal hearing to consider objections in light of the deviation proposal. The court emphasized comprehensive review of objections and mandated the respondent to redo the revised assessment expeditiously, incorporating findings from the hearing and the deviation proposal within twelve weeks. The judgment aimed to ensure procedural integrity under the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383701</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>