<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (7) TMI 1395 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383699</link>
    <description>The court concluded that the petitioners&#039; grievance did not survive and disposed of the writ-application without addressing the legality and validity of Clause 12.5(c) of Part IV of Form 205B. The court noted that the petitioners had no further grievance to redress in light of the respondents&#039; explanations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Jul 2019 20:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=581621" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (7) TMI 1395 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383699</link>
      <description>The court concluded that the petitioners&#039; grievance did not survive and disposed of the writ-application without addressing the legality and validity of Clause 12.5(c) of Part IV of Form 205B. The court noted that the petitioners had no further grievance to redress in light of the respondents&#039; explanations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383699</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>