<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (5) TMI 22 - DELHI High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19162</link>
    <description>The High Court affirmed the assessee&#039;s right to change the valuation method of closing stock if done bona fide and consistently. The Court upheld the assessee&#039;s method of valuing DBM dust at nil, reducing assessable income by Rs. 70,50,677. The High Court rejected the Revenue&#039;s petition, emphasizing the importance of a bona fide and consistent approach to valuation methods.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 May 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 13:31:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=58161" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (5) TMI 22 - DELHI High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19162</link>
      <description>The High Court affirmed the assessee&#039;s right to change the valuation method of closing stock if done bona fide and consistently. The Court upheld the assessee&#039;s method of valuing DBM dust at nil, reducing assessable income by Rs. 70,50,677. The High Court rejected the Revenue&#039;s petition, emphasizing the importance of a bona fide and consistent approach to valuation methods.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 May 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19162</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>