https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282247 An express statutory bar on staying proceedings under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 prevails over the High Court's inherent and revisional powers under the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. Section 19(3)(c) uses a non obstante clause and prohibits stays on grounds other than those specifically permitted, so Section 482 cannot be invoked to override that restriction and Section 397 cannot be used to achieve the same result. The provision is directed at preventing delay in corruption trials, and stay orders under either jurisdiction are barred. en-us Thu, 25 Jan 2001 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 29 Jul 2019 16:15:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282247 An express statutory bar on staying proceedings under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 prevails over the High Court's inherent and revisional powers under the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. Section 19(3)(c) uses a non obstante clause and prohibits stays on grounds other than those specifically permitted, so Section 482 cannot be invoked to override that restriction and Section 397 cannot be used to achieve the same result. The provision is directed at preventing delay in corruption trials, and stay orders under either jurisdiction are barred. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 25 Jan 2001 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282247