<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (1) TMI 32 - RAJASTHAN High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19160</link>
    <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the assessee, allowing the deduction of Rs. 2,64,113 demanded by the land and building tax authority for earlier years in the assessment year 1979-80. The court emphasized that under the mercantile system of accounting, the additional tax liability created after the assessee had paid the admitted tax amount could not have been anticipated, and therefore, should be considered for computing the total income of the assessee for the relevant year.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 13:27:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=58159" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (1) TMI 32 - RAJASTHAN High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19160</link>
      <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the assessee, allowing the deduction of Rs. 2,64,113 demanded by the land and building tax authority for earlier years in the assessment year 1979-80. The court emphasized that under the mercantile system of accounting, the additional tax liability created after the assessee had paid the admitted tax amount could not have been anticipated, and therefore, should be considered for computing the total income of the assessee for the relevant year.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19160</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>