<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (4) TMI 934 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282246</link>
    <description>The ITAT Chennai partly allowed the appeal filed by the Revenue in a case involving delay in filing appeal, computation of capital gains, and deduction under Section 54 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The delay in filing the appeal was condoned, and the appeal was admitted. Regarding the computation of capital gains, the ITAT Chennai held that the fair market value declared by the assessee for wealth-tax purposes should also be considered for income-tax purposes. Consequently, the Assessing Officer&#039;s order was reinstated, and the CIT(Appeals)&#039;s order directing adoption of a different value for computing capital gains was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Jul 2019 14:59:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=581589" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (4) TMI 934 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282246</link>
      <description>The ITAT Chennai partly allowed the appeal filed by the Revenue in a case involving delay in filing appeal, computation of capital gains, and deduction under Section 54 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The delay in filing the appeal was condoned, and the appeal was admitted. Regarding the computation of capital gains, the ITAT Chennai held that the fair market value declared by the assessee for wealth-tax purposes should also be considered for income-tax purposes. Consequently, the Assessing Officer&#039;s order was reinstated, and the CIT(Appeals)&#039;s order directing adoption of a different value for computing capital gains was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282246</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>