<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (7) TMI 1389 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383693</link>
    <description>LED wall, projector and related accessories used with a computer or laptop were not treated as computer equipment eligible for 60% depreciation because they were independent electronic devices, not shown to be integral parts of the computer system. Operating an item through software or with a laptop did not by itself make it a computer accessory or peripheral. The higher depreciation claim was rejected, and depreciation at 15% as plant and machinery was sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Jul 2019 09:28:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=581567" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (7) TMI 1389 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383693</link>
      <description>LED wall, projector and related accessories used with a computer or laptop were not treated as computer equipment eligible for 60% depreciation because they were independent electronic devices, not shown to be integral parts of the computer system. Operating an item through software or with a laptop did not by itself make it a computer accessory or peripheral. The higher depreciation claim was rejected, and depreciation at 15% as plant and machinery was sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383693</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>