<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (7) TMI 1380 - PATNA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383684</link>
    <description>The Patna HC disposed of a writ application concerning GST burden on works contractors. Petitioners complained about paying GST on works allotted based on Schedule of Rates that didn&#039;t account for GST implications for contracts where estimates were prepared and agreements executed before July 1, 2017, but work continued post-GST implementation. The court found petitioners&#039; grievance regarding differential amounts arising from GST implementation had been redressed through Rural Works Department meeting minutes. Petitioners&#039; counsel agreed their grievance would be resolved if Clause (vii) of the meeting minutes was followed by all government works departments. The court concluded nothing remained for adjudication as the grievance was adequately addressed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2025 13:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=581556" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (7) TMI 1380 - PATNA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383684</link>
      <description>The Patna HC disposed of a writ application concerning GST burden on works contractors. Petitioners complained about paying GST on works allotted based on Schedule of Rates that didn&#039;t account for GST implications for contracts where estimates were prepared and agreements executed before July 1, 2017, but work continued post-GST implementation. The court found petitioners&#039; grievance regarding differential amounts arising from GST implementation had been redressed through Rural Works Department meeting minutes. Petitioners&#039; counsel agreed their grievance would be resolved if Clause (vii) of the meeting minutes was followed by all government works departments. The court concluded nothing remained for adjudication as the grievance was adequately addressed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383684</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>