<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (7) TMI 1366 - ITAT GUWAHATI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383670</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found the penalty notice issued under Section 274 read with Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, to be defective as it did not specify the charge against the Assessee. Citing precedents and the necessity of specifying the charge, the Tribunal set aside the penalty of Rs. 95,900/- imposed by the AO for the assessment year 2013-14, ultimately ruling in favor of the Assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Jul 2019 08:20:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=581532" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (7) TMI 1366 - ITAT GUWAHATI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383670</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found the penalty notice issued under Section 274 read with Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, to be defective as it did not specify the charge against the Assessee. Citing precedents and the necessity of specifying the charge, the Tribunal set aside the penalty of Rs. 95,900/- imposed by the AO for the assessment year 2013-14, ultimately ruling in favor of the Assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383670</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>