<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (7) TMI 1353 - TELANGANA AND ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383657</link>
    <description>A short delay in filing a statutory appeal may be condoned where the explanation is plausible and does not show wilful negligence. Here, the delay was supported by an undisputed medical certificate showing that the employee handling the matter was ill, and the difficulty in arranging the pre-deposit was also considered. The Court noted that the delay was only 96 days, the service tax liability had already been discharged under the VCES scheme, and the Tribunal should have taken a liberal view in the interests of justice. The refusal to condone delay was held unsustainable, and the appeal was directed to be numbered and heard according to law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Aug 2019 11:02:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=581518" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (7) TMI 1353 - TELANGANA AND ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383657</link>
      <description>A short delay in filing a statutory appeal may be condoned where the explanation is plausible and does not show wilful negligence. Here, the delay was supported by an undisputed medical certificate showing that the employee handling the matter was ill, and the difficulty in arranging the pre-deposit was also considered. The Court noted that the delay was only 96 days, the service tax liability had already been discharged under the VCES scheme, and the Tribunal should have taken a liberal view in the interests of justice. The refusal to condone delay was held unsustainable, and the appeal was directed to be numbered and heard according to law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383657</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>