https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383654 The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner(Appeals)'s decision, allowing the respondents to avail CENVAT credit on input services for manufacturing and exporting exempted goods. It was determined that no bond or Letter of Undertaking was required while exporting goods chargeable to nil rate of duty, based on legal precedents and statutory provisions. The Revenue's appeal was dismissed in both instances, affirming the eligibility of the respondents for the credit and the exemption from furnishing a bond for exporting goods at nil rate of duty. en-us Thu, 25 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 29 Jul 2019 08:10:11 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383654 The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner(Appeals)'s decision, allowing the respondents to avail CENVAT credit on input services for manufacturing and exporting exempted goods. It was determined that no bond or Letter of Undertaking was required while exporting goods chargeable to nil rate of duty, based on legal precedents and statutory provisions. The Revenue's appeal was dismissed in both instances, affirming the eligibility of the respondents for the credit and the exemption from furnishing a bond for exporting goods at nil rate of duty. Case-Laws Service Tax Thu, 25 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383654