<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (7) TMI 1345 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383649</link>
    <description>The High Court allowed the petition, quashed the Order-in-Appeal, and restored the appeal for further consideration by the Commissioner (A) on merits. The Court emphasized the importance of preventing injustice and ensuring fair proceedings, even if the statutory authority lacked the power to condone delay beyond a certain period.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Nov 2019 13:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=581508" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (7) TMI 1345 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383649</link>
      <description>The High Court allowed the petition, quashed the Order-in-Appeal, and restored the appeal for further consideration by the Commissioner (A) on merits. The Court emphasized the importance of preventing injustice and ensuring fair proceedings, even if the statutory authority lacked the power to condone delay beyond a certain period.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383649</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>