https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383648 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the order confirming the demand for inadmissible CENVAT Credit on various input services. It was established that the services in question qualified as input services under the CENVAT Credit Rules, supported by relevant precedents. The specific issue regarding GTA service credit was deemed irrelevant as the Appellant had not availed such credit. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of adhering to the definition of input services and granted relief in favor of the Appellant. en-us Tue, 23 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 27 Jul 2019 12:18:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383648 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the order confirming the demand for inadmissible CENVAT Credit on various input services. It was established that the services in question qualified as input services under the CENVAT Credit Rules, supported by relevant precedents. The specific issue regarding GTA service credit was deemed irrelevant as the Appellant had not availed such credit. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of adhering to the definition of input services and granted relief in favor of the Appellant. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 23 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383648