<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (7) TMI 1343 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383647</link>
    <description>Tax could not be levied on the sale of old gunny bags, empty drums, film and rolls because the authorities never identified any existing charging entry under which the goods were taxable. Mere treatment of the assessee as a deemed manufacturer or importer, or the fact that the goods were sold within the State, did not by itself create taxability. The foundational requirement was to locate the specific point of tax under the statute, and that exercise was absent at every stage. Remand was declined, as it would only have given the revenue a fresh to build a new case. The assessee was held not liable to suffer tax on the sales.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Jul 2019 07:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=581506" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (7) TMI 1343 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383647</link>
      <description>Tax could not be levied on the sale of old gunny bags, empty drums, film and rolls because the authorities never identified any existing charging entry under which the goods were taxable. Mere treatment of the assessee as a deemed manufacturer or importer, or the fact that the goods were sold within the State, did not by itself create taxability. The foundational requirement was to locate the specific point of tax under the statute, and that exercise was absent at every stage. Remand was declined, as it would only have given the revenue a fresh to build a new case. The assessee was held not liable to suffer tax on the sales.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383647</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>