https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383640 A Commission of Inquiry report based on illegal mining, trade and transport of ore was treated as a non-binding fact-finding exercise rather than an adjudication of individual liability. The challenge on the ground that affected persons were not heard under Sections 8-B and 8-C of the Commission of Inquiry Act, 1952 did not justify writ interference, because the Union and the State stated that no action would follow merely from the report and any future action would require independent assessment and hearing. In that setting, the absence of notice was insufficient to quash the report or its adverse observations. en-us Tue, 02 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 27 Jul 2019 11:30:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383640 A Commission of Inquiry report based on illegal mining, trade and transport of ore was treated as a non-binding fact-finding exercise rather than an adjudication of individual liability. The challenge on the ground that affected persons were not heard under Sections 8-B and 8-C of the Commission of Inquiry Act, 1952 did not justify writ interference, because the Union and the State stated that no action would follow merely from the report and any future action would require independent assessment and hearing. In that setting, the absence of notice was insufficient to quash the report or its adverse observations. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 02 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383640