<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (2) TMI 886 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282232</link>
    <description>The Delhi High Court admitted the appeal and formulated the question of law in the case, which will be listed for further proceedings. Justices Badar Durrez Ahmed and R.V. Easwar presided over the matter, with representation from Mr. Ajay Vohra, Ms. Kavita Jha, and Mr. Amit Sachdeva for the Respondent.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Jul 2019 12:47:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=581482" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (2) TMI 886 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282232</link>
      <description>The Delhi High Court admitted the appeal and formulated the question of law in the case, which will be listed for further proceedings. Justices Badar Durrez Ahmed and R.V. Easwar presided over the matter, with representation from Mr. Ajay Vohra, Ms. Kavita Jha, and Mr. Amit Sachdeva for the Respondent.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282232</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>