<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (1) TMI 366 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282231</link>
    <description>A Commission of Inquiry may regulate the sequence of witness examination under the statute and rules, so no rigid order is mandatory. Section 8-B applies in substance where the Commission itself contemplates inquiry into a person&#039;s conduct or where reputation may be prejudicially affected, even without a formal notice. A person so protected must first be allowed to lead defence evidence before being required for cross-examination, because early compulsion would defeat the statutory safeguard. Where refusal to testify is justified by that illegality, prosecution based on the refusal cannot stand and the resulting complaints and proceedings are liable to be quashed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Nov 2021 18:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=581475" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (1) TMI 366 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282231</link>
      <description>A Commission of Inquiry may regulate the sequence of witness examination under the statute and rules, so no rigid order is mandatory. Section 8-B applies in substance where the Commission itself contemplates inquiry into a person&#039;s conduct or where reputation may be prejudicially affected, even without a formal notice. A person so protected must first be allowed to lead defence evidence before being required for cross-examination, because early compulsion would defeat the statutory safeguard. Where refusal to testify is justified by that illegality, prosecution based on the refusal cannot stand and the resulting complaints and proceedings are liable to be quashed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282231</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>