<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (7) TMI 1329 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383633</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the detention order and penalty notice under the UPGST Act, citing the availability of a statutory remedy through appeal under the CGST Act. The court clarified that its decision did not address the merits of the case, allowing the petitioners to pursue the statutory remedy without hindrance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2025 12:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=581456" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (7) TMI 1329 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383633</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the detention order and penalty notice under the UPGST Act, citing the availability of a statutory remedy through appeal under the CGST Act. The court clarified that its decision did not address the merits of the case, allowing the petitioners to pursue the statutory remedy without hindrance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383633</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>