<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (3) TMI 77 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19145</link>
    <description>The court ruled against the assessee and in favor of the Revenue, emphasizing that capital gains and exemptions should be assessed in the hands of the donor/transferor (husband) when the property is transferred to the spouse. The Tribunal&#039;s decision to delete the capital gain from the assessee&#039;s assessment was overturned, and the court clarified the proper interpretation of relevant provisions to prevent tax evasion. No costs were awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Mar 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 12:53:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=58144" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (3) TMI 77 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19145</link>
      <description>The court ruled against the assessee and in favor of the Revenue, emphasizing that capital gains and exemptions should be assessed in the hands of the donor/transferor (husband) when the property is transferred to the spouse. The Tribunal&#039;s decision to delete the capital gain from the assessee&#039;s assessment was overturned, and the court clarified the proper interpretation of relevant provisions to prevent tax evasion. No costs were awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Mar 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19145</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>