<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (7) TMI 1313 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383617</link>
    <description>The tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, ruling that the assessee successfully proved the genuineness of unsecured loan transactions totaling Rs. 1,05,00,000/- taken from companies allegedly controlled by Shri Praveen Kumar Jain. The tribunal found that the Assessing Officer failed to rebut the evidence presented by the assessee, leading to the dismissal of the revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Jul 2019 11:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=581431" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (7) TMI 1313 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383617</link>
      <description>The tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, ruling that the assessee successfully proved the genuineness of unsecured loan transactions totaling Rs. 1,05,00,000/- taken from companies allegedly controlled by Shri Praveen Kumar Jain. The tribunal found that the Assessing Officer failed to rebut the evidence presented by the assessee, leading to the dismissal of the revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383617</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>