<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (4) TMI 49 - DELHI High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19143</link>
    <description>The Delhi HC held that a Revenue question framed under section 256(2) of the Income-tax Act was, in substance, a question of fact because it depended on the Tribunal&#039;s appreciation of evidence and findings on disputed additions. As no referable question of law arose, the statutory condition for directing a reference to the High Court was not met, and the reference petition was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Apr 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 12:37:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=58142" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (4) TMI 49 - DELHI High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19143</link>
      <description>The Delhi HC held that a Revenue question framed under section 256(2) of the Income-tax Act was, in substance, a question of fact because it depended on the Tribunal&#039;s appreciation of evidence and findings on disputed additions. As no referable question of law arose, the statutory condition for directing a reference to the High Court was not met, and the reference petition was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Apr 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19143</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>