<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (3) TMI 1614 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282227</link>
    <description>An application for bail under Section 439 CrPC arose from allegations under Section 132 of the GST Act concerning alleged embezzlement of input tax credit through fake invoices. The respondent stated that the charge sheet had not yet been filed and sought continued custody for investigation. The applicant then withdrew the bail application with liberty to move again at an appropriate stage, and the Court granted that liberty and dismissed the application as withdrawn.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2025 17:19:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=581398" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (3) TMI 1614 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282227</link>
      <description>An application for bail under Section 439 CrPC arose from allegations under Section 132 of the GST Act concerning alleged embezzlement of input tax credit through fake invoices. The respondent stated that the charge sheet had not yet been filed and sought continued custody for investigation. The applicant then withdrew the bail application with liberty to move again at an appropriate stage, and the Court granted that liberty and dismissed the application as withdrawn.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282227</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>